ALMM-II Gets a Six-Month Breather for Net Metering & OA: What Must Every Stakeholder Do Before the December 2026 Deadline?

A Six-Month Opportunity to Prepare India for Successful Implementation

The Extension is Not the Finish Line—It is the Preparation Period.

India's solar manufacturing ambitions deserve wholehearted support.

No serious stakeholder opposes the objective of making India self-reliant in solar manufacturing.

ALMM-II is perhaps one of the most important policy reforms introduced by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE). If implemented successfully, it can strengthen domestic manufacturing, reduce dependence on imports, improve supply chain security and create long-term confidence in Indian manufacturing.

The objective is excellent.

The challenge has never been the objective.

The challenge has always been implementation.

The latest MNRE Order dated 18 July 2026, granting exemption for Net Metering and Open Access projects till December 2026, should therefore not be viewed merely as another extension.

It should be viewed as India's six-month implementation window.

A window during which every stakeholder—from MNRE to manufacturers, DISCOMs, EPC companies and consumers—must prepare for January 2027.

Because after December, there should ideally be no confusion left.

Looking Back:

What Have We Learned Since 1 June 2026?

The last seven weeks have been one of the biggest learning periods for the rooftop solar industry.

Several policy clarifications had to be issued one after another.

This itself indicates how complex ALMM-II implementation actually is.

Some of the major developments include:

Phase 1

Initial Office Memorandum (25 May)

MNRE announced that there would be no blanket extension, while allowing relief for investments already made.

However, the practical framework largely addressed utility-scale projects.

The rooftop solar ecosystem was left with unanswered questions.

This concern was precisely highlighted by REAR in its representation requesting a separate clarification for rooftop projects, noting that rooftop installations differ fundamentally from utility-scale projects in consumer profile, approval processes, and implementation realities.

Phase 2

Rooftop Clarification

MNRE later issued a dedicated clarification for rooftop projects.

This itself acknowledged that rooftop solar required separate treatment.

Exactly what many industry stakeholders had requested.

Phase 3

NISE Portal Timeline

The clarification mentioned that exemption cases could be submitted up to 15 July.

However...

the portal reportedly closed after 30 June, creating uncertainty for stakeholders before it was later reopened.

For EPC companies already struggling with project execution, such inconsistencies only added confusion.

Phase 4

State-Level Verification Committees

Today almost every DISCOM has constituted committees.

Officers are verifying:

• module details

• invoices

• commissioning dates

• exemption eligibility

• project documents

This clearly shows that implementation has shifted from policy making to field-level administration.

But one important question still remains:

Are all states following the same verification process?

Currently, the answer appears to be No.

Phase 5

The Missing SOP

Perhaps the biggest gap today is the absence of a comprehensive national implementation SOP.

This was another issue highlighted by REAR, which requested a uniform SOP defining stakeholder responsibilities, verification methodology, documentation requirements, accountability, and a centralized digital traceability framework instead of multiple interpretations across states.

Without uniform procedures,

every DISCOM may interpret compliance differently.

That is not ideal for a national policy.

The Biggest Question

ALMM-II is no longer merely about modules.

It has become a question of governance.

Who verifies?

Who certifies?

Who takes responsibility?

Which portal is final?

What documents are sufficient?

How are disputes resolved?

How will field officers distinguish an ALMM-II-compliant module from a standard DCR-certified module?

These are implementation questions—not policy questions.

What Should Happen Before December?

1. MNRE

The Ministry has already shown flexibility by issuing multiple clarifications.

The next step should be creating certainty.

Ideally, the next six months should focus on:

• Comprehensive national SOP

• Standard verification procedure

• Digital traceability mechanism

• Uniform documentation

• Standard inspection checklist

• Centralized compliance portal

• Defined responsibilities for every stakeholder

• Training material for DISCOM officials

This transition period offers an opportunity to replace ambiguity with predictability.

2. DISCOMs

Every state should avoid creating independent interpretations.

Instead,

implementation should remain nationally uniform.

Field engineers require:

• standardized checklists

• document verification protocol

• digital validation tools

• training on ALMM-II compliance

Consistency across states will reduce delays and disputes.

3. Solar Module Manufacturers

The responsibility is equally significant.

Manufacturers should focus on:

• increasing cell production capacity

• stabilizing module supply

• improving traceability

• standardized serial numbering

• transparent documentation

• faster commissioning of announced manufacturing lines

Supply confidence is just as important as manufacturing capacity.

4. Cell Manufacturers

The industry has repeatedly emphasized that ALMM-II ultimately depends on domestic cell availability.

The next six months should therefore prioritize:

• commissioning announced capacities

• improving production yields

• securing raw material supply

• reducing lead times

Without sufficient domestic cells, implementation challenges will persist.

5. EPC Companies and Vendors

Instead of waiting for policy certainty,

this period should be used strategically.

Diversifying business portfolios could help reduce risk.

Areas worth strengthening include:

• Commercial & Industrial (C&I) rooftop projects

• Open Access advisory

• O&M services

• Energy storage integration

• Solar insurance

• Asset management

• Energy efficiency solutions

Operational preparedness will matter as much as policy preparedness.

6. Consumers

For consumers—especially C&I and institutional buyers—the current exemption period may represent the final opportunity to execute projects under the present transition framework.

Those who have already completed feasibility studies or financial approvals should avoid unnecessary delays.

Waiting until the last quarter could create supply constraints, longer approval timelines, or execution bottlenecks.

Early planning allows better procurement choices and smoother project execution.

7. Financial Institutions

Banks and NBFCs also have a role.

Financing teams should understand evolving compliance requirements so that project appraisal and disbursement are not delayed by uncertainty over ALMM-II documentation.

What Success Looks Like on 1 January 2027

If India uses these six months effectively,

January 2027 should not begin with fresh clarification orders.

Instead, every stakeholder should know:

• which modules qualify,

• how compliance is verified,

• which documents are required,

• who is accountable,

• and how implementation is monitored.

That would represent a mature transition from policy announcement to nationwide execution.

The Real Opportunity

The extension till December should not be interpreted as a policy retreat.

It can be viewed as an opportunity to strengthen implementation.

The success of ALMM-II will ultimately be measured not only by how many domestic cells are manufactured, but also by how smoothly the policy is implemented across millions of distributed solar projects.

India has demonstrated that it can formulate ambitious renewable energy policies.

The next challenge is to ensure that implementation is equally robust, transparent, and predictable.

If these six months are used to build a clear operational framework, ALMM-II can become not just a manufacturing milestone, but a benchmark for effective policy execution.

Questions for the Industry

I'd be interested in hearing perspectives from across the ecosystem:

• Is a six-month transition sufficient for full ALMM-II readiness?

• What is the single biggest implementation challenge today—manufacturing capacity, traceability, or verification?

• Should India establish a unified national digital platform for ALMM-II compliance and verification?

• How can the rooftop sector, manufacturers, DISCOMs, and policymakers work together to ensure a smooth transition from January 2027?

• 
  

A strong manufacturing ecosystem and a well-executed implementation framework are complementary goals. The coming six months provide an opportunity to align both in support of India's long-term renewable energy ambitions.